Scooby Doo “Misogyny Incorporated”

I’ve always liked Scooby Doo cartoons.  Maybe the “spooky” plots appealed to my budding love of horror (as a child), or maybe I just had the same love of the ginormous and dopey Scooby that I imagine was pretty common.  And in it’s current incarnation Mystery Incorporated, I can enjoy a show that has survived, relatively unchanged, with my daughter.  

But maybe that’s the problem.  It is relatively unchanged.  Despite the more modern technology included in the newer episodes, and the added element of fairly shallow relationship drama between the characters, the same ol’ costumes the characters have always worn are not the only thing that is painfully retro about this show.

I'm always stoked to see the characters in anything besides their normal outfits, even if it is a stereotypically sexist situation like...ugh...the girls at a spa.

I’m always stoked to see the characters in anything besides their normal outfits…even if it is a stereotypically sexist situation.

Though featuring some pretty decent names in the voice cast– Matthew Lillard as Shaggy, Patrick Warburton as the recurring character, Sheriff Stone, Gary Cole, Vivica Fox, Francis Conroy, Tia Carrere, Jeff Bennett (animated voice actor heavy weight!), Clancy Brown (Mr. Krabs!!!) and Casey Kasem (radio personality and the original Shaggy)– I’m a bit disappointed in Mystery Incorporated.

Hanna- Barbera, Warner Bros., and Cartoon Network had an opportunity here to not only revamp this old series, but to reel in a new generation of kids with trickier plots, smarter technology, and better role models…and they failed miserably.  I realize it’s just a cartoon, and but doesn’t the inclusion of an element of mystery sort of imply they want kids to be interested while they are entertained, and to think?  

Instead. what we got was the same old boring formula.  Sure, the some of the monsters may be a little more innovative, and the Scooby and “the gang” have more electronic toys available to them to help them on their way, but that’s pretty much the extent of the changes.  I realize the creators and producers likely want to stay sort of loyal to the originals; if they changed too much, the show might lose some of it’s nostalgic appeal for older viewers like me.  Playing devil’s advocate though, how many of today’s viewers really have any frame of reference in regards to the older Scooby shows??? Wikipedia is more generous in their assessment of the show, stating:

 [...]the series takes a tongue-in-cheek approach to the classic Scooby-Doo formula (similar to A Pup Named Scooby-Doo and Shaggy & Scooby-Doo Get A Clue!), with increasingly outlandish technology, skills and scenarios making up each villain’s story, and a different spin on the famous “meddling kids” quote at the end of every episode. Contrasting sharply with this, however, are two elements that have never been used in a Scooby-Doo series before: a serial format with an ongoing story arc featuring many dark plot elements that are treated with near-total seriousness, and ongoing relationship drama between the characters.

But what rankled me the most about the show is something that was probably present in the earlier shows as well, but was likely something I just didn’t pick up on as much in my younger days, and that is the overall superficiality of the characters and the reinforcement of cliquishness and stereotypes.

Daphne is the “pretty one.”  She’s a rich girl from a rich, snobby family, and she simpers over Fred as if being the object of his affection and attention her life’s dream.

And poor Velma.  She’s smart and she’s the techie of the group (if you discount Fred’s obsession with ridiculously elaborate traps.)   She’s curvy and wears her signature skirt, turtleneck, knee socks, and glasses…  And she is still alluded to as being the homely, nerdy, lonely, and even fat girl of the group.  Fat???  Since when is having boobs and a butt a bad thing?  Oh, right…in this country the “prettiest” women on our magazine covers are as narrow and devoid of curves as a twelve year old boy…  And everyone is subject to our scrutiny.

I forgot...this is America, so apparently, this is fat...

I forgot…this is America, so apparently, this is fat…

The other day I saw an episode about a villain that was performing some sort of love spell on people, resulting in immediate and random pairings of characters– just whoever they happened to be standing next to at the moment.  Granted, it was always a perfectly even ration of male to female characters– no sexually ambiguous pairings on this show!–  But that didn’t stop Daphne from pointing out,  in a shocked and appalled voice, the fact that “nerds” and “cool people” were suddenly in love!  Eeek! The humanity!

There’s another character on the show named Marcie Fleach.  Her nickname is “hot dog water.”  It made me giggle at first…until the characters went on to characterize her;  she’s smart… but she’s rumpled and messy looking, and she allegedly smells like “recycled water used to cook hot dogs.”  In short, she’s the class freak, and she’s portrayed with in the same “ugly betty” way as Velma (basically, if they didn’t tell you she was supposed to be ugly, you probably wouldn’t think it.)  I know I’m not the first person to notice the way “smart” people are always categorically considered “ugly.”

Ugly Betties

Ugly Betties

Those of you who are regular readers know that I’m not generally in the habit of making mountains out of mole hills, but for some reason, this annoys the piss out of me.  If I really think about it, it’s probably because this type of categorization is so adolescent.  It’s introducing our young children to “the IN-crowd,” teaching kids that it’s normal and okay to ostracize people based on how they look.  It’s reinforcing immature stereotypes that start in elementary school and (more and more frequently lately) result in bullying and violence in high school.

I’m not trying to be all chicken little here.  The sky’s not falling, or anything because of this stupid kid’s show.  I just basically don’t like snobby people or bullies.  That kind of behavior is not something I want my daughter to learn, pigeon-holing people into groups (which are then basically judged as worthy or not worthy of inclusion.)

What do you think, gentle readers?

About these ads

12 responses to “Scooby Doo “Misogyny Incorporated”

  1. Great post!
    Things like this have been in my head lately.
    The way women are portrayed is usually ridiculous, the smart and cute is not possible, unless, she’s a smart kick ass girl, in which case she always has to show more flesh than necessary. Just take a look at the video games, women must be almost half naked.
    Velma was always my favorite character, Daphne always got on my nerves.

    • Daphne is a ditz for sure. And it’s interesting you mention the “smart kick ass girl.” The “hot kick ass girl with an attitude” is another trope I am tired of for sure!

  2. “I’m not generally one to make mountains out of mole hills…”

    Moving on.

    Her name is Velma?? I thought it was Thelma! What the fuck kind of name is Velma?? Answer me!!!!

  3. It’s wierd, because I thought a lot of cartoons were changing this type of stuff. I guess I don’t have a ton of experience, because I’ve only seen an episode of Ben 10 at work. But that had a strong female character. I don’t know… They’re jerks.

    • I dunno. I’ve been thinking about this a lot lately, because my typical view point is not to make a big deal of this type of thing. I mean, it’s just a cartoon, right? But maybe the fact that it seems to occur a LOT in this particular cartoon is part of the problem. Not just sexism, but also “classism” and petty “cliquishness.”

      • Yeah. I fell like as younger generations take over, it’ll get better. But that may be wishful thinking. You should watch Batman The Animated Series instead. Always good.

  4. I don’t think that you made a mountain out of a molehill at all! These tropes can do a lot of damage to our early perceptions of self. When girls stop acting smart when they hit middle school because ‘smart isn’t sexy’ we have a real problem with this. I was truly disappointed when I let the kids watch the show last night. I had hoped that a more modern show would have been absent the sexist stereotypes. Unfortunately, I was mistaken.

    • Yeah, I really am usually pretty “chill” when it comes to most things. I’m not uber feminist, and I give a lot of TV shows a pass, because it IS just mindless entertainment, and in this case, a kid’s show. But this particular show really annoyed. Kids get bombarded with these stupid ideas enough by other kids at school and by society enough. And not just the sexism, but the whole “nerds and geeks” thing that crops up in this show too.
      Thanks for stopping by and commenting!

  5. I’m watching it now, with my two daughters. I was initially delighted when the reruns of the late 60s/early 70s versh were aired. The kids loved them, and it gave me a major nostalgia rush. And then I found there was a 90s series that was pretty good, with its power pop tunes and vague hipster referencing. And now this, nicely made, but written by sexist pricks. Its constant reliance on trad girl/boy roles is utterly depressing, and I hate that my kids enjoy it. The only thing I can do is always point out the crappy sexist tropes when they crop up.

    • I know…and if your kids are really young like mine, they prob look at you like, Dad, what are you TALKING about??? lol… Thankfully, my girl is on Superheros now, DC and Marvel, so I think that’s a step up at least!!! Thanks for reading!

Message for the Queen?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s